Page Section: Left Content Column
Page Section: Centre Content Column
Conflict of interest in counselling relationship (12HDC01512)
Download Conflict of interest in counselling relationship (12HDC01512) (PDF 38Kb)
(12HDC01512, 20 February
2014)
Counsellor ~ Ethical standards ~ Conflict of interest ~
Multiple relationships ~ Respect ~ Rights 1(1), 4(2)
A woman complained about the services provided to her by a
counsellor, with whom she attended both individual counselling
sessions and joint counselling sessions with her husband. One of
the reasons for engaging the counsellor was for relationship
counselling. The woman had three individual sessions with the
counsellor before enquiring about the possibility of attending
joint sessions with her husband.
The woman and her husband attended four joint sessions before
making a decision to separate formally. From this point, the
woman's estranged husband commenced individual sessions with the
counsellor, the woman continued to attend individual sessions, and
both the woman and her estranged husband also attended joint
sessions with the counsellor.
The relationship between the counsellor and the woman broke
down. The woman felt that the counsellor had become biased towards
her estranged husband. Thereafter, for a short period of time, the
woman and the counsellor continued to communicate by email. The
counsellor admitted that she was disrespectful towards the woman in
her communications.
It was held that the counsellor failed to recognise that
providing services to the woman's estranged husband would be in
direct conflict with the woman's interests. By supporting the
woman's estranged husband against the woman's interests as the
relationship broke down, by turning against the woman, and by
continuing to counsel the woman's estranged husband, the counsellor
acted in breach of the trust placed in her, as well as not acting
impartially and neutrally. In doing so the counsellor failed to
comply with ethical standards and breached Right 4(2).
The counsellor was also disrespectful to the woman in her email
communications and breached Right 1(1).
Page Section: Right Content Column
Top of Page