Page Section: Breadcrumbs
you are here:
Home
> Decisions & Case Notes > Case Notes > Death of young woman prescribed second-generation contraceptive pill despite history of superficial thrombosis (03HDC00837)
Page Section: Left Content Column
Page Section: Centre Content Column
Death of young woman prescribed second-generation contraceptive pill despite history of superficial thrombosis (03HDC00837)
Download Death of young woman prescribed second-generation contraceptive pill despite history of superficial thrombosis (03HDC00837) (PDF 12Kb)
(03HDC00837, 2 December 2003)
General practitioner ~ Standard
of care ~ Prescription of oral contraceptive ~ Risk factors ~
Missed diagnosis of pulmonary embolism ~ Rights 4(1),
6(2)
A father complained about the services provided to his daughter by
a general practitioner who: (1) prescribed oral contraceptives even
though the woman had a recent history of thrombophlebitis; and (2)
did not diagnose that she was suffering from pulmonary emboli. The
woman, aged 39 years, died as a result of a lung infarction caused
by pulmonary emboli from a deep vein thrombosis.
The Commissioner reasoned that: (1) superficial thrombosis with
thrombophlebitis, although not an absolute contraindication, is
associated with increased risk of thromboembolism, and is listed as
a risk factor for oral contraceptives; and (2) the possible
increased risk should have been disclosed and increased care was
needed in follow-up.
It was held that the GP breached Right 4(1) because he did not act
with reasonable care and skill when he prescribed the
second-generation contraceptive pill, in that he did not address
the woman's personal risk when he failed to: (a) take a
comprehensive personal and family history to exclude
contraindications; (b) review her personal risk factors prior to
prescribing, including her varicose veins and recent
thrombophlebitis; (c) discuss alternative management options; and
(d) document his findings and the discussion.
However, the GP did not breach Right 4(1) by failing to diagnose
the patient's pulmonary embolism, because his assessment and
management of the patient's chest complaints was consistent with
the standards of a competent doctor. There was no reason to believe
that the patient was suffering from a life-threatening condition
because: (1) even though she had symptoms of pulmonary emboli, the
symptoms were equally consistent with asthma secondary to a chest
infection, which the patient had suffered in the past; and (2) the
patient did not report any leg swelling, which would have made the
diagnosis of pulmonary emboli significantly easier.
The Commissioner commented that a prudent medical practitioner
should inform a patient of the risks associated with taking the
oral contraceptive, and discuss any personal risk factors.
Page Section: Right Content Column
Top of Page