Page Section: Centre Content Column
Delayed post-dates induction of labour and inadequate assessment of risks (11HDC00515)
Download Delayed post-dates induction of labour and inadequate assessment of risks (11HDC00515) (PDF 45Kb)
(11HDC00515, 11 July
Midwife ~ Obstetrician ~ District health board ~ Risk
factors ~ Decreased fetal movements ~ Appropriateness of care ~
During a woman's first pregnancy she was reviewed by an
obstetrician at 40 weeks and six days' gestation and was diagnosed
with oligohydramnios. The woman delivered her baby by emergency
Caesarean section following a failed induction. During the
delivery, the fetal heart showed at least three episodes of
bradycardia. However, the baby was born healthy and was not
identified as being growth restricted.
During the woman's second pregnancy her Body Mass Index was 36,
which indicated maternal obesity. The woman's Lead Maternity Carer
(LMC) was a hospital midwife, who referred the woman to an
obstetrician. At 31 weeks and two days' gestation the obstetrician
assessed the woman and noted the complications in her first
At 40 weeks and one day gestation the woman reported decreased
fetal movements to her LMC. The following day, the woman repeated
her concerns to the obstetrician. The obstetrician conducted a
bedside ultrasound scan and cardiotocograph (CTG) monitoring. At
that time the woman had respiratory symptoms, so the obstetrician
decided to delay an elective Caesarean section until the woman's
symptoms had cleared. At 41 weeks and one day gestation the woman
was admitted to hospital for a pre-admission check, and ultrasound
scans confirmed intrauterine fetal death. The following day the
woman delivered her stillborn baby by induction. Poor communication
contributed to the LMC not being present at the birth. The
post-mortem report states that the baby was small for gestation, as
was the woman's first child.
The Commissioner found that the obstetrician should have taken a
more cautious approach to the management of the woman's second
pregnancy. At the woman's initial consultation the obstetrician
should have considered whether serial ultrasound growth assessments
were warranted. When the woman reported decreased fetal movements
two days post term, the obstetrician should have carefully
considered the woman's risk factors and either assessed her or
delivered the baby on or before 40 weeks and six days' gestation.
To delay the Caesarean section until 41 weeks and two days'
gestation, without earlier assessment, was suboptimal. The
obstetrician was held to have breached Right 4(1).
DHB staff should have recognised that the woman's delivery would
be distressing and ensured that she had appropriate support,
particularly from her LMC.
The LMC was initially unclear about the nature and extent of her
responsibilities. The LMC had a duty to ensure she was clear about
her clinical responsibilities and to make those responsibilities
clear to the woman. If there is any ambiguity, a discussion between
a woman and her LMC should take place.