Page Section: Left Content Column
Page Section: Centre Content Column
GP management of an exacerbation of chronic airways disease (01HDC11412)
Download GP management of an exacerbation of chronic airways disease (01HDC11412) (PDF 12Kb)
(01HDC11412, 7 May 2003)
General practitioner ~ Standard
of care ~ COPD ~ Medication management ~ Record-keeping ~ Patient
monitoring ~ Co-ordination of providers ~ Certification of death ~
Rights 4(1), 4(2)
A complaint was made by a woman about the services provided to her
late husband by a GP. The 77-year-old patient was suffering from a
mild exacerbation of his chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
(COPD). The complaint was that the GP:
1) did not admit the patient to hospital for his shortness
of breath;
2) did not consult with the patient's respiratory
specialist;
3) administered IV salbutamol (Ventolin);
4) did not keep the patient under observation after
administering the salbutamol;
5) did not contact the police following the patient's sudden
death; and
6) certified the patient's death as being a result of
pulmonary failure.
The Commissioner held that the GP breached Right 4(1) as he did
not provide services with reasonable care and skill in that:
1) it is not standard practice to inject salbutamol (which
should be reserved for severe, life-threatening exacerbations),
either intramuscularly or intravenously, for acute on chronic COPD
and, in doing so, the GP introduced an unnecessary element of risk,
which may have contributed to the patient's sudden death; and
2) having considered that the exacerbation was severe enough
to warrant an injection of salbutamol, the GP should have provided
oxygen therapy, monitored the patient closely, and arranged
admission to hospital.
The GP also breached Right 4(2) because his documentation fell
below professional standards. However, there was no breach of the
Code in not consulting the respiratory specialist, because patients
experiencing a mild to moderate exacerbation of COPD are routinely
treated in general practice.
The Commissioner commented that although his jurisdiction does not
extend to events following death, it is usual for a GP to issue a
death certificate without autopsy and without contacting the Police
in an elderly person such as the patient, who had severe disease
known to be associated with sudden death.
A copy of the Commissioner's report was sent to the Medical
Council with a recommendation to consider whether a competence
review of the GP was warranted.
Page Section: Right Content Column
Top of Page