Page Section: Centre Content Column
Information provided by massage therapist (13HDC01307)
Download Information provided by massage therapist (13HDC01307) (PDF 71Kb)
26 May 2015)
Massage therapist ~ Tui Na ~
Information ~ Informed consent ~ Record-keeping ~ Rights 6(2),
A woman had a 90-minute Tui Na massage with a massage therapist.
The woman had purchased an online promotional voucher for the
treatment. Tui Na massage is a form of Chinese medical massage
using acupressure (focussed on acupuncture points). The treatment
often uses very deep pressure. The voucher did not describe Tui Na
in any detail. The woman was under the impression that the massage
would be a relaxation treatment.
A sign outside the therapist's treatment room displayed the
clinic's name and "free ACC" on it. The woman told HDC that she
"felt safe that they were accredited by ACC". However, the
therapist was renting a room in the clinic, and ACC accreditation
did not extend to the therapist.
The therapist began the treatment without taking a client
history or explaining or discussing with the woman what to expect
from the treatment. The woman found the treatment to be very
forceful and painful. The treatment involved the therapist at one
point climbing onto the massage table on all fours and slowly
lowering her knees onto the larger muscles of the woman's back. The
therapist submitted that her hands and feet were always supporting
her own weight. The therapist provided a copy of brief handwritten
notes relating to the treatment.
After the treatment, the woman had a very bad night's sleep. She
had a sore back, neck, and shoulders in the days afterwards. She
said she had none of these symptoms prior to the treatment. She
also had a headache which continued for a few days. The woman
telephoned ACC and discovered the therapist was not accredited with
Given the nature of the treatment, the therapist should have
clearly explained and communicated to the woman, a new client, that
Tui Na massage was a deep tissue massage and could potentially be
uncomfortable and painful for her. That is information that a
reasonable consumer would need to receive to give informed consent.
The absence of information given to the woman about what the
treatment would entail meant that she did not have the information
she required in order to give informed consent. Therefore, the
therapist breached Right 6(2).
Except in limited circumstances, Right 7 of the Code provides
that services may be provided to a consumer only if that consumer
makes an informed choice and gives informed consent. Due to the
lack of information provided to the woman, she was unable to make
an informed choice or give informed consent. It follows, therefore,
that the therapist also breached Right 7(1).
Adverse comment was made about the therapist's use of her knees
as a technique to apply pressure, as it is not usual practice for a
Tui Na massage therapist. Adverse comment was also made that the
therapist should have kept a more detailed record of the care she