Page Section: Left Content Column
Page Section: Centre Content Column
Insulin dispensing error (07HDC21772)
Download Insulin dispensing error (07HDC21772) (PDF 137Kb)
(07HDC21772, 27 June 2008)
Pharmacist ~ Pharmacy ~ Dispensing error ~ Out-of-date
medication ~ Professional standards ~ Standard operating procedures
~ Incident reports ~ Rights 4(1), 4(2)
A 21-year-old man with type one diabetes complained that a
pharmacist not only dispensed him the wrong insulin, but that the
insulin he received was out of date.
The man went to collect his usual three-month supply of insulin
from the pharmacy. He was prescribed Humalog, a fast-acting, short
duration insulin, and Humulin NPH, an intermediate-acting insulin.
He received the correct dosage of Humalog but the sole charge
pharmacist dispensed Humulin R, a short-acting insulin, in place of
Humulin NPH. The consumer questioned the type of Humulin he had
received and was told by the pharmacist that the pharmaceutical
company had discontinued Humulin NPH and replaced this with Humulin
R. The pharmacist instructed the consumer to use Humulin R in the
same way as he would have used Humulin NPH.
Ten days later, when the consumer was about to start on his new
batch of insulin, he telephoned the pharmacist and again questioned
whether he had been given the correct insulin. The pharmacist again
told him that Humulin NPH had been discontinued and to take Humulin
R in the same way he had previously used Humulin NPH. The consumer
did as instructed and within two days suffered serious adverse
effects. He was seen by a specialist diabetes nurse, who said that
he had been given the wrong insulin and that Humulin NPH had not
been discontinued. The consumer also noted that the Humulin R he
received had expired by 18 months.
It was held that the pharmacist breached Right 4(1) in not
providing an appropriate standard of care, and Right 4(2) for not
following the Pharmacy Council's Code of Ethics. The pharmacist
relied on his memory concerning changes made to this product and,
despite being questioned twice by the consumer, did not take
appropriate steps to confirm that he was dispensing the correct
medication. When an error is identified, it should be investigated,
and dispensing procedures reviewed to minimise ongoing harm and to
prevent a recurrence of the error. It was also held that the
pharmacy breached Right 4(1) in not having an up-to-date dispensing
procedure appropriate for a business mainly reliant on a sole
pharmacist, and was severely deficient in documenting and
responding to errors.
Page Section: Right Content Column
Top of Page