Page Section: Left Content Column
Page Section: Centre Content Column
Management of stroke in Emergency Department (00HDC07869)
Download Management of stroke in Emergency Department (00HDC07869) (PDF 12Kb)
(00HDC07869, 29 November 2002)
Public hospital ~ Emergency Department ~ Medical registrar ~
Nurse ~ Management of stroke ~ Triage times ~ Investigations and
pain relief ~ Rights 4(1), 4(2)
A woman complained about the services provided to her 73-year-old
mother at a public hospital. The patient was taken to the hospital
by ambulance with a suspected stroke. During the wait in the
Emergency Department, her daughter repeatedly told the staff of her
mother's worsening symptoms. The complaint was that there was a
delay in the patient receiving appropriate examination and pain
relief and obtaining a CT scan and treatment, and inadequate
monitoring of her deteriorating condition.
The Commissioner held that:
1) the hospital did not breach Right 4(2) because although
the patient was not assessed by a doctor within one hour of her
arrival, thereby failing to meet the emergency medicine triage
standards, the staff still responded reasonably in the
circumstances;
2) the triage nurse did not breach Right 4(1), as the
assessment of the patient as triage 4 was reasonable on the basis
of the patient's presentation on arrival at the Emergency
Department;
3) the Emergency Department nurse did not breach Right 4(1),
as there was no evidence that she failed to perform her duties
appropriately;
4) another nurse did not breach Right 4(1) in that:
(a) although the delay in providing the patient with
paracetamol was regrettable, it is inevitable that minor delays
will occur in busy Emergency Departments; and
(b) she monitored the patient's condition regularly and, when
the patient showed signs of further deterioration, appropriately
informed the medical registrar; and
5) the medical registrar did not breach Right 4(1) in
relation to:
(a) the CT scan, as there was no inappropriate delay in
ordering and completing the scan;
(b) obtaining a neurosurgical opinion, as she attempted to
gain the results quickly and, in response to the patient's further
deterioration, sought advice about whether anything else could be
done;
(c) the consultation with the on-call physician, as her
intervention was timely and appropriate; and
(d) not prescribing dexamethasone and Vitamin K sooner, as
the CT scan needed to be reported first, and earlier medical input
would not have influenced the final outcome.
Page Section: Right Content Column
Top of Page