Page Section: Centre Content Column
Monitoring of fundal height during pregnancy (15HDC00673)
Download Monitoring of fundal height during pregnancy (15HDC00673) (PDF 76Kb)
(15HDC00673, 20 May
Community-based midwife ~ Antenatal monitoring ~ Fundal
height ~ IUGR ~ Fetal movements ~ Right 4(1)
A 19-year-old woman, pregnant with her first child, engaged a
community-based midwife as her Lead Maternity Carer (LMC). At 29+4
weeks' gestation, during a routine antenatal appointment, the
midwife commenced fundal height measurements and noted that the
fundal height measured 27cm and the woman's weight was 60.2kg. The
midwife arranged to see the woman again in four weeks' time.
The midwife saw the woman again at 33+4 weeks' gestation. During
this appointment the woman reported a change in fetal movements.
The midwife questioned the woman about the fetal movements, noting
that they had changed from being violent to more "swoosh like". The
midwife considered that this change in the feel of the fetal
movements was expected due to the baby getting bigger. The midwife
recorded the fundal height as 29cm and the woman's weight as
65.5kg. The midwife planned to see the woman again in two weeks'
The midwife saw the woman again at 35+4 weeks' gestation. She
documented that the woman was reporting good fetal movements, and
that her fundal height was 31cm and her weight was 66.2kg.
The midwife saw the woman two weeks later. She noted that the
woman was reporting good fetal movements, and that her fundal
height was 32.5cm and her weight remained static at 66.2kg. The
midwife arranged an ultrasound growth scan. The scan was scheduled
for six days later. The midwife planned to see the woman on the day
following the scan.
The following day the woman reported having decreased fetal
movements all day. The midwife requested that the woman lie down on
her left side with her hands on her abdomen and pay attention to
the fetal movements, and to call back in 30 minutes. The woman
called back advising that there had been no improvement in the
fetal movements. The midwife immediately arranged for the woman to
be assessed by her colleague, a registered midwife, at their clinic
The second midwife assessed the woman and carried out a
cardiotocograph, which was documented as "not reassuring enough to
leave for scan … ". The second midwife contacted the on-call
obstetrician at the hospital and arranged for the woman to be
assessed in the Birthing and Assessment Unit. Following assessment
the baby was found to have severe intrauterine growth restriction
(IUGR), and a decision was made to induce labour the following
morning. The following day the baby was born via forceps delivery.
He was treated for severe IUGR. He is now well and has met all his
By not commencing fundal height measurements until 29+4 weeks'
gestation, and by failing to identify and respond to the clinical
features of IUGR, the midwife failed to provide services with
reasonable care and skill. Accordingly, the midwife breached Right
4(1). Criticism was made of the midwife's failure to fully document
details of her decision-making and discussions with the woman.
The Commissioner recommended that the midwife attend further
training in relation to the use of customised growth charts and
antenatal assessment. The Commissioner also recommended that the
Midwifery Council of New Zealand consider whether a review of the
midwife's competence is warranted.