Page Section: Breadcrumbs
you are here:
Home
> Decisions & Case Notes > Case Notes > Overdose of testosterone administered to infant with congenital adrenal hypoplasia (04HDC03355)
Page Section: Left Content Column
Page Section: Centre Content Column
Overdose of testosterone administered to infant with congenital adrenal hypoplasia (04HDC03355)
Download Overdose of testosterone administered to infant with congenital adrenal hypoplasia (04HDC03355) (PDF 40Kb)
(04HDC03355, 3 May 2005)
Registered nurse ~ Medical centre ~ Overdose ~ Testosterone
enanthate ~ Congenital adrenal hypoplasia ~ Scope of practice ~
Protocols ~ Regional differences ~ Communication ~ Vicarious
liability ~ Professional standards ~ Rights 4(1), 4(2)
Soon after birth, an infant was
diagnosed with adrenal hypoplasia, an extremely rare congenital
condition. The condition was well controlled with regular
medication, but a paediatric endocrinologist in a larger city
suggested that the infant undertake a short course of testosterone
to ensure normal phallus growth. Three 25mg injections of
testosterone enanthate were to be administered one month apart. The
specialist's standard practice was to write a prescription for the
parents to fill and take to their GP's nurse, who would administer
the course of injections. The specialist did not include specific
instructions with the prescription, as he considered it a
straightforward drug to administer. The specialist's letter of
assessment to the boy's paediatrician and GP did not mention the
testosterone treatment or the dosage, and delays meant that the
letter was not received before the prescription was filled and
administered.
Although the specialist discussed
the proposed testosterone treatment with the boy's local
paediatrician, the paediatrician did not send the boy's GP written
instructions about the treatment, as it was always his intention to
administer the injections at the hospital as per local
practice.
The delays in communication meant
that the first injection was administered, correctly, by a nurse at
the medical practice. The next injection, administered by another
practice nurse, was administered at 10 times the prescribed dose.
When the nurse then went to document the procedure, she recognised
her mistake and told another nurse, who alerted the boy's GP. The
family was alerted, the overdose monitored and managed, and the
nurse apologised.
It was held that the nurse did not
take reasonable care or comply with the standards expected of a
registered nurse, and in doing so breached Rights 4(1) and 4(2).
The medical practice was not vicariously liable for the nurse's
breaches.
Page Section: Right Content Column
Top of Page