Page Section: Left Content Column
Page Section: Centre Content Column
Patient unaware that addiction to benzodiazepines could develop in a few weeks (00HDC11568)
Download Patient unaware that addiction to benzodiazepines could develop in a few weeks (00HDC11568) (PDF 13Kb)
(00HDC11568, 13 December 2001)
General practitioner ~ Mental
illness ~ Standard of care ~ Co-operation among providers ~
Information about treatment options ~ Medication management ~ Side
effects ~ Follow-up care ~ Patient responsibility ~ Rights 4(1),
4(5), 6(1)(a), 6(1)(b)
A complaint was made about the services provided by three general
practitioners. The 27-year-old male patient complained that the
first GP did not advise that he could become addicted to lorazepam,
a benzodiazepine, within four weeks, or that Aropax, an
antidepressant, can initially increase anxiety. The Commissioner
held that the GP breached Right 6(1)(b), as the patient should have
been warned of potential pitfalls, including the possibility of
dependence in the short term, even if the risk was low. However,
the GP had no obligation to advise the patient of any risk of
increased anxiety when starting Aropax.
The patient also complained that the GP did not tell him about
different types of antidepressants and their side effects. However,
it was not necessary to present the patient with a list of
antidepressants and ask his preference. It was also considered
reasonable that the GP had not referred him for further assessment,
as only a small percentage of patients who have not responded after
six weeks will require referral. The GP also made appropriate
arrangements to see the patient on an urgent basis.
The decision of the second GP to prescribe a second two-week
supply of lorazepam was considered reasonable, as it was based on
the patient's reported relief, his confirmation that he would be
reviewed in two weeks' time, and a determination that there was
nothing to suggest addiction. Likewise, it was reasonable not to
make a specialist referral at this early stage or any arrangement
for follow-up, as the patient had an appointment in two weeks'
time. However, the GP subsequently breached Right 4(1) when,
despite a recommendation from Psychiatric Services that no
sedatives be prescribed, he prescribed a further five days' supply
of lorazepam and Imovane (an anxiolytic to help sleep) to tide the
patient over until he received specialist care.
The complaint against the third GP was that he did not read the
patient's notes in detail and did not take the benzodiazepine
addiction seriously. However, there was no evidence to support this
complaint. The GP realised that he could not stop the
benzodiazepine at short notice, so had no choice but to continue
the prescription until other providers could treat the
addiction.
The Commissioner commented on continuity of care in a GP practice,
noting that it is preferable for a patient with difficult and
sensitive problems to be seen by his usual doctor. If the patient
wishes to see another doctor, this should alert staff to ask for an
explanation. In this case the patient had to accept some
responsibility for his failure to take his medication as
prescribed, his abuse of alcohol, and his drug-seeking
behaviour.
Page Section: Right Content Column
Top of Page