Page Section: Centre Content Column
Postnatal care provided to woman with pyrexia (08HDC18402)
Download Postnatal care provided to woman with pyrexia (08HDC18402) (PDF 149Kb)
(08HDC18402, 7 September
2010)
Maternity Clinic ~ Primary birthing unit ~ Midwives ~ Lead
maternity carer ~ Standard of care ~ Postnatal care ~ Pyrexia ~
Abdominal pain ~ Assessment and monitoring ~ Puerperal sepsis ~
Transport to hospital ~ Communication amongst providers ~
Documentation ~ Rights 4(1), 4(2), 4(5)
A 38-year-old woman complained about the standard of postnatal
care she received from a primary birthing unit and her lead
maternity carer (LMC). After giving birth at a hospital, the woman
was transferred to the maternity clinic for postnatal care. The
following night she complained of abdominal pain to a staff
midwife. She also suffered rigors and shivering. A staff midwife
took the woman's temperature at midnight and found it to be
elevated (38.6°C). The woman was given painkillers and her
temperature had returned to normal by early morning.
Later that morning the woman complained of feeling hungry and
dizzy, and two hours later she advised the staff midwife that,
after speaking to her LMC over the telephone, she had decided to go
to hospital to be assessed as she felt very unwell. The staff
midwife did not carry out any assessments on the woman, and there
is no evidence that an ambulance was offered to her.
The woman's husband picked her up from the birthing unit and
took her to hospital, where she was noted to be "very unwell" on
arrival and had low blood pressure. She was subsequently diagnosed
with puerperal sepsis, caused by Group A Streptococcus. The woman
spent time in the high dependency unit and the intensive care unit,
and was discharged home 13 days later.
It was found that the maternity clinic breached Rights 4(1) and
4(2). It was directly liable for not having a policy for managing
elevated postnatal maternal temperatures in a manner consistent
with national guidelines, and for not having clear policies about
communication between LMCs and the birthing unit's midwives. It was
vicariously liable for the failure by its staff to adequately
consider, and discuss with the woman and her LMC, referral to
specialist services.
One of the birthing unit's staff midwives was found in breach of
Rights 4(1), 4(2), and 4(5) for failing to monitor and assess the
woman, failing to consult the woman's LMC about the woman's
transfer to hospital, and failing to keep detailed and accurate
notes about the woman's condition and transport to hospital.
The woman's LMC was found in breach of Right 4(2) of the Code
for departing from professional standards relating to
documentation.